How to Prove God Doesn't Exist

PDF download Download Article
Find the perfect claim to win your religious debate
PDF download Download Article

Whether you’re debating God for a school project, trying to convert a radical friend, or simply interested in the arguments out there, you may be looking for ideas on how to disprove God. There are plenty of solid scientific, historical, philosophical, and cultural claims you can make. We’ll cover the most compelling, popular, and effective arguments here. Whatever approach you adopt, ensure that you stay polite and considerate when discussing religion—it can be a very sensitive topic for some people.

How to Argue God Doesn’t Exist

  • It is impossible to prove God exists, so it follows that there’s no reason to believe God is real.
  • If God is good and omnipotent, why does evil exist? God either must not be all-powerful or purely good. In either case, they shouldn’t be worshipped.
  • Occam’s razor states that the simplest explanation is often the most likely. Is a magical deity in charge of everything really the best way to explain life?
Section 1 of 4:

Scientific Arguments

PDF download Download Article
  1. Step 1 Premise—There’s no scientific evidence that God exists.
    There’s no possible experiment people could perform that would prove or disprove God’s existence. This is often demonstrated via Russel’s teapot: a popular atheist thought experiment. Picture there is a magical teapot floating in an orbit around the sun between Mars and Earth. It’s too small to view or perceive with a telescope. How do you prove it exists? You can’t! So, the best you can do is take a common sense approach and assume there is no such teapot.[1]
    • As an extension to this thought experiment, let’s pretend the teapot does exist. Would that be a good reason to worship it? Even if you could affirm the existence of God, it’s not a good reason to follow a religion.
  2. Step 2 Premise—Living things are too poorly designed for God to exist.
    The argument from poor design states that if God is perfect, why did he create us and many other living creatures so poorly? For instance, we are vulnerable to many diseases, our bones break easily, and our bodies and minds break down over time. Our spines break down, we develop inflexible knees, and our pelvic bones that make childbirth difficult and painful for women. Together, this biological evidence indicates that God does not exist (or that he did not create us well, in which case, there is no reason to worship him).[2]
    • Believers might counter this argument by stating that if God is perfect, then he created us as well as could possibly be expected. They might also argue that what we see as imperfections actually have a purpose in the larger workings of God's design. Point out the logical fallacy in this right away. We can't live our lives hoping that one day an explanation for why our eyes or shoulders were designed so poorly will arise.
    Advertisement
  3. Step 3 Premise—All “unexplainable” things will eventually be explained.
    The “God of the Gaps” argument is common when people argue that God exists. It argues that while modern science can explain many things, it cannot explain others. Refute this by saying that the things we do not understand are decreasing every year and that while natural explanations have replaced theistic explanations, supernatural or theistic explanations never replace scientific ones.[3]
    • For instance, you might cite the example of evolution as one area where science has revised previous God-centric explanations for the variety of species in our world.
    • Argue that religion has often been used to explain the unexplainable. The Greeks used Poseidon to explain how earthquakes happen, which we now know is due to the movement of tectonic plates to relieve pressure.
  4. Step 4 Premise—We have proven that creationism is false.
    If the existence of the world can be explained purely in scientific terms, then it is unnecessary to say that God brought the world into being. According to the principle of Occam's razor, the simplest explanation is generally the best. Creationism is the belief that God created the world, usually within a relatively recent time frame like 5,000-6,000 years ago. Draw on the wealth of reasonable evidence that disproves this, such as evolutionary data, fossils, radiocarbon dating, and ice cores to argue that creationism is false and that belief in God is unnecessary.[4]
    • For instance, you might say, “We find rocks all the time that are dated to be millions or even billions of years old. Doesn't this conflict with the belief that the universe was recently created by God?”
    5. Advertisement
Section 2 of 4:

Cultural Arguments

PDF download Download Article
  1. Step 1 Premise—Belief in God is socially determined.
    There are several variations on this idea. You could explain that in relatively poor nations, almost everyone believes in God, while in relatively rich and developed nations, few people believe in God. You could also state that people who are well-educated are more likely to be atheists than those who have lower levels of education. Together, these facts make a strong case that God is only a cultural product and belief in God depends on one's particular social circumstances.[5]
    • You could also suggest that people who are raised in one religion overwhelmingly tend to stick with that religion throughout their lives. Those who were not raised in a religious household, conversely, rarely become religious later.
  2. Step 2 Premise—Religion only exists to make us feel better.
    The world is scary, confusing, violent, and overwhelming, but it’s a lot easier to make it through life if we believe we’re going to have eternal life and salvation in the end. Hard times are easier if we think an all-powerful entity has our back! The fact that religion feels good doesn’t mean it’s likely to be true.[6]
    • Ever hear the phrase “no atheists in a foxhole?” It’s a common adage that points out it’s comforting to believe in God when things are terrible.
    • Pascal’s Wager is a powerful line of argumentation here. The idea is that there’s no punishment for believing in God if there is no God, but there is a punishment (hell) if God is somehow real and you don’t believe. So, there’s no incentive to not believe, and believing can only benefit you.
  3. Step 3 Premise—Religion’s popularity isn’t evidence of God.
    Even if there is a God, there’s no way to know if we’ve composed the right religion to worship them. This “common consent” argument might also suppose that because belief in God is so high, such a belief must be natural. However, you can refute this idea by proposing that just because many people believe something, it is not right. For instance, you might explain that belief in the Greek gods was common but is now no longer socially acceptable.[7]
    • Suggest that if people are not exposed to religion or the idea of God, they will tend to not believe in God.
  4. Step 4 Premise—There are so many “gods” that none are likely to be real.
    The identities and characteristics of the Abrahamic, Hindu, and Buddhist Gods are very different. Therefore, you could argue that even if God exists, there is no way to know which God should be worshipped. If there were an omnipotent, all-powerful God, surely they wouldn’t let humans spend centuries worshiping and arguing over the fake Gods, right?[8]
    • This is known formally as the argument from inconsistent revelations.
  5. Step 5 Premise—Religious texts aren’t consistent or sensical.
    Most religions offer their holy texts as both a product of and evidence for their God. If you can demonstrate that a holy text is inconsistent or otherwise flawed, you'd provide a solid justification for God's nonexistence.[9]
    • For instance, if God is described in one part of the holy text as forgiving, but later wipes out a whole village or country, you could use this apparent contradiction to demonstrate that God could not exist (or that the holy text is lying).
    • In the case of the Bible, often entire verses, stories, and anecdotes were falsified or changed at some point. For instance, Mark 9:29 and John 7:53 to 8:11 contain passages that were copied from other sources. Explain that this demonstrates that holy texts are just a mishmash of creative ideas produced by people, not divinely inspired books.
    6. Advertisement
Section 3 of 4:

Philosophical Arguments

PDF download Download Article
  1. Step 1 Premise—If God exists, he would not allow unbelief.
    This argument proposes that where atheism exists, God would descend or intervene personally in the world to reveal himself to atheists. The fact that so many atheists exist, however, and that God has not attempted to persuade them through divine intervention, means that God likely does not exist.[10]
    • Believers might counter this claim by stating that God allows free will, and that therefore, unbelief is an inevitable outcome of this. They might cite specific instances in their holy texts of occasions when their God revealed himself to people who still refused to believe.
  2. Step 2 Premise—Belief in God is incompatible with reality.
    If the believer's faith is premised on the idea that God created the universe because “All things have a beginning and an end,” you could ask, “If that is so, then what created God?" This will emphasize to the other person that they are unfairly concluding that God exists when in fact, the same basic premise (that all things have a beginning) can lead to two different conclusions.[11]
    • People who believe in God might counter that God (being omnipotent) is outside of space and time, and is, therefore, the exception to the rule that all things have a beginning and an end. If they counter in this way, you should direct the argument towards the contradictions in the idea of omnipotence.
  3. Step 3 Premise—The existence of evil disproves a good, omnipotent God.
    This is called the “problem of evil” and it has been a powerful counterargument for religion for centuries. How can an all-powerful God exist if evil exists? In other words, if God exists and is good, he should eliminate all evil. "If God truly cared about us,” you could argue, “there would be no wars."[12]
    • Your conversation partner might reply "Governments by man are ungodly and fallible. People, not God, cause evil.” In this way, your conversation partner might again invoke the idea of free will to counter the notion that God is responsible for all the wickedness in the world. Still, this counter fails to explain the evil that is not caused by humans, such as sickness from microorganisms and earthquakes.
    • You could also go one step further and argue that even if a bad god exists who does allow evil, he is not worth worshiping.
  4. Step 4 Premise—Morality does not require any religious belief.
    Many people believe that without religion, the planet would descend into immoral chaos. However, you can explain that your own behavior (or that of any other atheist) is little different than that of the believer. Admit that while you are not perfect, nobody is, and belief in God does not drive people to necessarily be more moral or righteous than anyone else.[13]
    • You could also reverse this proposition by arguing that not only does religion not lead to goodness, it leads to evil since many religious people commit immoral acts in the name of their God. You might, for instance, draw attention to the Spanish Inquisition or all of the religious terrorism around the world.
    • In addition, animals that are incapable of understanding our human concept of religion show clear evidence of instinctual understanding of moral behavior and distinguishing between right and wrong.
    • You could argue that morality is a social behavior that helps ensure the collective survival of a species and is not necessarily spiritually linked.
  5. Step 5 Premise—A good, holy life does not require worship of God.
    Many people believe that only with God can one live a rich, happy, and full life. However, you could point out that many people who do not believe are happier and more successful than those who are religious.[14]
    • For instance, you might draw attention to Richard Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens as individuals who met with great success despite the fact they do not believe in God.
  6. Step 6 Premise—God cannot be omniscient if we have free will.
    If God knows what you’re going to do, you can’t really have complete free will. If you have complete free will, God can’t be omniscient. Omniscience, the ability to know everything, seems to be at odds with most religious dogma. Free will refers to the idea that you are in charge of your actions and therefore responsible for them. Most religions believe in both concepts, but they are completely incompatible.[15]
    • Say to your conversation partner, “If God knows everything that has happened and will happen, as well as every thought your mind creates before you think it, your future is a foregone conclusion. That being the case, how can God judge us for what we do?”
    • People who believe in God may answer that although God knows an individual's decision beforehand, individual actions are still each person's free choice. This idea is a nice thought, but it is still contradictory for the reasons above.
  7. Step 7 Premise—Omnipotence cannot exist and is a paradox on its own.
    Omnipotence is the ability to do anything. If God can do anything, though, he should be able to, for instance, draw a square circle. However, since this is logically incoherent, it makes no sense to believe that God is omnipotent. To pose the classic question, can God create a rock so heavy he couldn’t lift it?[16]
    • Another logically impossible thing you could suggest God cannot do is to know and not know something at the same time.
    • You could also argue that if God is omnipotent, why does he allow natural disasters, massacres, and wars?
    • Some believers offer the idea that perhaps God isn't completely omnipotent, and that while he is extremely powerful, he cannot do absolutely everything. This may explain why God can do some things but cannot logically do others.
  8. Step 8 Premise—The onus is on believers to prove God exists, and they can’t.
    In reality, it is practically impossible to prove that something does not exist. Anything could exist, but in order for a belief to be valid and worthy of attention, it needs hard evidence to back it up. Propose that rather than arguing that God does not exist, the believer needs to provide proof that God does exist, and they can’t.[17]
    • For instance, you could ask what happens after death. Many people who believe in God also believe in an afterlife. Ask for evidence of this afterlife.
    • Spiritual entities such as gods, devils, heaven, hell, angels, demons, and so on have never been (and cannot be) scientifically examined or observed. Point out that these spiritual features cannot be proven to exist if they are not observable and measurable.
    9. Advertisement
Section 4 of 4:

Discussing and Debating Religion Effectively

PDF download Download Article
  1. Step 1 Read famous atheist works to help inform your positions.
    Prepare to argue that God doesn't exist by familiarizing yourself with the main arguments and ideas of well-known atheists. God is Not Great, by Christopher Hitchens, for instance, is a good place to start. The God Delusion, by Richard Dawkins, is another excellent source of rational arguments against the existence of a religious deity.[18]
    • In addition to researching arguments in favor of atheism, investigate the rebuttals or justifications from the religious perspective.
    • Be familiar with the issues or beliefs that might invite your opponent's criticism, and ensure you can adequately defend your own beliefs.
  2. Step 2 Arrange your arguments...
    Arrange your arguments in a logical way. If your arguments are not presented in a straightforward and understandable way, your message will be lost on the person you're talking to, and your arguments will be weak. For instance, when explaining how one's religion is culturally determined, you should get the other person to agree with each of your premises (the basic facts that lead to your conclusion).[19]
    • You might say, “Mexico was settled by a Catholic country, right?”
    • When they answer yes, move on to the next premise, like “Most people in Mexico are Catholic, right?”
    • When they answer yes, move on to your conclusion by saying, for instance, “The reason that most people believe in God in Mexico is the history of the religious culture there.”
  3. Step 3 Be accommodating, sensitive, and calm.
    Belief in God is a sensitive topic. Approach the debate as a conversation in which both you and your conversation partner have valid points. Speak in a friendly manner to your conversation partner. Ask them for reasons as to why they believe so strongly in their faith. Listen patiently to their reasons and tailor your responses appropriately and thoughtfully to what they have to say.[20]
    • Ask your conversation partner for resources (books or websites) that you can use to learn more about their perspective and beliefs.
    • Belief in God is complicated, and statements about God's existence -- either for or against -- cannot be taken as fact.
  4. Step 4 Keep your cool if things get a little heated.
    The existence of God can be an emotionally-charged topic. If you are excited or aggressive during the conversation, you might be incoherent and/or say something that you regret. Try deep breathing to stay calm. Breathe in slowly through your nose for five seconds, then breathe out through your mouth for three seconds. Repeat until you feel calm.[21]
    • Slow down so that you have more time to think about what you want to say and avoid saying something you later regret.
    • If you start feeling angry, say to your conversation partner, “Let's agree to disagree,” then part ways from them.
    • Be polite when discussing God. Remember a lot of people are sensitive about their religions. Be respectful of those who believe in God. Do not use offensive or accusatory language like bad, stupid, or crazy. Do not call your conversation partner names.
    • In the end, rather than making a concise point, your opponent will often default to "I'm sorry you're going to Hell.” Do not respond with an equally passive-aggressive retort.
    5. Advertisement

Community Q&A

Search
Add New Question
  • Question
    What do I do if someone tries to force their religion on me, or calls me disgusting for not believing?
    Writingismypassion
    Writingismypassion
    Community Answer
    Say, "Not everyone has the same views. I would appreciate it if you could stop trying to force your beliefs on me and be a little more respectful."
    Thanks! We're glad this was helpful.
     Thank you for your feedback.
     If wikiHow has helped you, please consider a small contribution to support us in helping more readers like you. We’re committed to providing the world with free how-to resources, and even $1 helps us in our mission. Support wikiHow
    Yes No
    Not Helpful 47 Helpful 161
  • Question
    Should I thoroughly read the Bible before arguing against the existence of God?
    Community Answer
    Community Answer
    Yes. You should respect everyone's opinion. Look at different points of view, and understand all sides before taking one.
    Thanks! We're glad this was helpful.
     Thank you for your feedback.
     If wikiHow has helped you, please consider a small contribution to support us in helping more readers like you. We’re committed to providing the world with free how-to resources, and even $1 helps us in our mission. Support wikiHow
    Yes No
    Not Helpful 82 Helpful 166
  • Question
    If God isn't real, then why are several things written in Revelations playing out in today's world?
    Community Answer
    Community Answer
    Because these things are common sense. I would bet all my savings that there is going to be a war in Europe in the next thousand years, but I'm not a God or a prophet or anything except a culturally and historically aware human being.
    Thanks! We're glad this was helpful.
     Thank you for your feedback.
     If wikiHow has helped you, please consider a small contribution to support us in helping more readers like you. We’re committed to providing the world with free how-to resources, and even $1 helps us in our mission. Support wikiHow
    Yes No
    Not Helpful 92 Helpful 288
See more answers
Ask a Question
200 characters left
Include your email address to get a message when this question is answered.
Submit
Advertisement

Tips

  • In 2008, Nebraska state senator Ernie Chambers sued God for "widespread death, destruction, and terrorization of millions upon millions of the Earth’s inhabitants." The lawsuit was dismissed on the grounds that God doesn't have an address, and thus couldn't be served a court summons. In response to the dismissal, Chambers argued "The court itself acknowledges the existence of God. A consequence of that acknowledgment is a recognition of God's omniscience [...] Since God knows everything, God has notice of this lawsuit."[22]
    Thanks
    Helpful 1 Not Helpful 0
  • Some people choose religion to get over a bad experience in their life such as addiction, or a tragic death. While religion can have positive impacts on people's lives and can help them in times of need, that does not mean that the ideas behind the religion are true. If you encounter someone who claims to have been helped like this, exercise caution, as you don't want to offend them, but you do not have to avoid them or pretend to think like them.
    Thanks
    Helpful 2 Not Helpful 0

Tips from our Readers

  • Take into account that your same argument could be flipped around to support the other person's belief. No matter what you believe, accept your own limitations. Only argue about things when it's appropriate and helpful. At the end of the day, most people can agree that we all share a basic human need to be understood, accepted, and safe.
  • Before debating, be sure to educate yourself by reading other arguments and research the other side. For instance, if you're having a discussion with a Christian, thoroughly read the Bible. Review the works of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John to fuel your debate.
  • People are may not change their beliefs because they lost an argument. In order to change, a person must come to a conclusion about their beliefs by themselves.
  • Start with other religions, like the Aztecs, Greeks, Roman and Scandinavian Gods and relate them to other known religions to support your argument.
Submit a Tip
All tip submissions are carefully reviewed before being published
Name
Please provide your name and last initial
Submit
Thanks for submitting a tip for review!
Advertisement

You Might Also Like

222 Angel Number MeaningWhat Does the Angel Number 222 Mean?
Get Rid of Demons
How to
Get Rid of Demons
Left Eye Twitching for Female Astrology MeaningLeft Eye Twitching for Females: What Astrology Says About Eye Twitching
Escape the Matrix
How to
Escape the Matrix and Become Your Own Person
Lutheran vs CatholicLutheranism vs Roman Catholicism: Similarities & Differences
Earth Angel MeaningAre You an Earth Angel? 18 Signs + 8 Archetypes
Part FortuneWhat Is Part of Fortune in Astrology & What Does It Mean?
Signs Twin Flame Is Thinking of You15 Unmistakable Signs That Your Twin Flame is Thinking About You
Squirrel Spiritual MeaningWhat Does Seeing a Squirrel Mean Spiritually? 5 Interpretations
333 Meaning from GodWhat Does the Number 333 Mean From God?
Deer Spiritual MeaningWhat Do Deer Symbolize Spiritually?
Chapel vs ChurchThe Difference Between a Church, Chapel, Cathedral, & Basilica
Hole in the Ear Spiritual MeaningThe Spiritual Meanings of a Hole in the Ear (Preauricular Pit)
The Meaning of a White DoveWhat Is the Meaning of a White Dove?
Advertisement

References

  1. ↑ https://www.theatlantic.com/personal/archive/2009/01/the-teapot-analogy/55930/
  2. ↑ https://www.reasonablefaith.org/media/debates/what-is-the-evidence-for-against-the-existence-of-god
  3. ↑ https://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/04/08/398227737/what-the-god-of-the-gaps-teaches-us-about-science
  4. ↑ http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dalrymple/scientific_age_earth.html
  5. ↑ https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/201005/why-atheism-will-replace-religion
  6. ↑ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pascal-wager/
  7. ↑ https://www.princeton.edu/~tkelly/cg.pdf
  8. ↑ https://thinkingthoughtout.com/2012/07/06/two-problems-of-revelation/
  9. ↑ https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/reasons-humanists-reject-bible/
  1. ↑ http://commonsenseatheism.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Drange-The-Argument-from-Non-Belief.pdf
  2. ↑ http://creation.com/who-created-god
  3. ↑ http://www.iep.utm.edu/evil-log/
  4. ↑ https://secularhumanism.org/2014/07/cont-how-morality-has-the-objectivity-that-matterswithout-god/
  5. ↑ https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/homo-consumericus/200912/atheism-and-carpe-diem-seize-the-day?collection=152500
  6. ↑ https://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu:183146
  7. ↑ https://crossexamined.org/can-god-create-a-rock-so-heavy-that-he-cannot-lift-it/
  8. ↑ https://www.gotquestions.org/Russells-teapot.html
  9. ↑ http://www.wittenberg.edu/sites/default/files/media/occ/forms/debate.pdf
  10. ↑ https://psychcentral.com/blog/how-to-argue-effectively
  11. ↑ https://au.reachout.com/identity/spirituality/respecting-others-spiritual-beliefs
  12. ↑ http://estestherapy.com/how-to-communicate-during-an-argument-7-quick-rules/
  13. ↑ https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna20827350

About This Article

wikiHow is a “wiki,” similar to Wikipedia, which means that many of our articles are co-written by multiple authors. To create this article, 149 people, some anonymous, worked to edit and improve it over time. This article has been viewed 1,035,834 times.
34 votes - 73%
Co-authors: 149
Updated: November 7, 2024
Views: 1,035,834
Categories: Philosophy and Religion
Article SummaryX

To argue that God doesn't exist, try to focus on the scientific and cultural evidence. Point out evidence of evolution that predates the theory of creationism. For example, scientists have used radiocarbon dating to prove that there are fossils over a millions of years old. While there’s a lot that science can’t explain, you could argue that the gap of what we don’t know is getting smaller, and it’s only a matter of time before people won’t need religion to explain things. You could also argue that believing in God is not necessarily a natural human trait. For example, people who aren’t exposed to religion or the idea of God as kids don’t tend to believe in God as adults. There are also many contradictions within religious texts. You could argue that these demonstrate a flawed model for God’s existence. To learn how to bring up philosophical arguments about God, read on!

Did this summary help you?

In other languages
Thanks to all authors for creating a page that has been read 1,035,834 times.
If you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission.

Did this article help you?

Advertisement